Last scanned:
This image is acceptable for production, but remediating the identified vulnerabilities is recommended to reduce the attack surface. The main concern is CVE-2026-33630 in c-ares, which can be exploited remotely to crash the container by sending malicious DNS responses, disrupting hostname resolution. Updating the c-ares package to a patched version would eliminate this risk.
| CVE ID | Adjusted Severity | Package | Exploit Probability | Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-33630 | MEDIUM6 | c-ares 1.34.6-r0 fixed in 1.34.8-r0 | — | Directly ExposedContext importance: MEDIUM |
| CVE-2025-68121 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.13, 1.25.7, 1.26.0-rc.3 | 0.8% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-39822 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.12, 1.26.5, 1.27.0-rc.2 | 0.2% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-61726 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.12, 1.25.6 | 1.9% Low-Moderate Risk | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-61729 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.11, 1.25.5 | 0.5% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-25679 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.8, 1.26.1 | 0.7% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-27145 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.11, 1.26.4 | 0.9% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-32280 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.9, 1.26.2 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-32281 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.9, 1.26.2 | 0.3% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-32283 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.9, 1.26.2 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-33811 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.10, 1.26.3 | 0.8% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-33814 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.10, 1.26.3 | 0.8% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-39820 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.10, 1.26.3 | 0.8% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-39836 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.10, 1.26.3 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-42499 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.10, 1.26.3 | 0.8% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-42504 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.11, 1.26.4 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-58183 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.8, 1.25.2 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-61728 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.12, 1.25.6 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-61727 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.11, 1.25.5 | 0.3% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-39825 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.10, 1.26.3 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-32282 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.9, 1.26.2 | 0.3% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-32289 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.9, 1.26.2 | 0.3% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-32288 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.9, 1.26.2 | 0.3% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-27142 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.8, 1.26.1 | 0.3% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-39823 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.10, 1.26.3 | 0.3% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-39826 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.10, 1.26.3 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-47912 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.8, 1.25.2 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-58185 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.8, 1.25.2 | 0.5% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-58187 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.9, 1.25.3 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-58188 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.8, 1.25.2 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-58189 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.8, 1.25.2 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-61723 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.8, 1.25.2 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-61724 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.8, 1.25.2 | 0.5% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-61725 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.8, 1.25.2 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-61730 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.12, 1.25.6 | 0.3% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-42505 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.12, 1.26.5, 1.27.0-rc.2 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-42507 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.11, 1.26.4 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2025-58186 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.24.8, 1.25.2 | 0.5% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-27139 | NONE0 | stdlib v1.24.6 fixed in 1.25.8, 1.26.1 | 0.2% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-39824 | NONE0 | golang.org/x/sys v0.1.0 fixed in 0.44.0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
Which CVEs are actually reachable — is the vulnerable code even linked and callable.
Live-container probes: default user, writable paths, capabilities, exposed ports.
Base-image lineage, package provenance and signatures — nothing slipped in unnoticed.
A step-by-step hardened build plan, with parity tests proving nothing breaks.
Want to check another image? Run a full scan with the Docker Security Scanner.