Last scanned:
This image carries significant risk; production deployment is highly discouraged without strict compensating controls. A remote attacker could cause a denial-of-service by exploiting CVE-2026-33630 in c-ares, crashing the HTTP server by sending malicious DNS responses. No specific compensating control fully eliminates this vulnerability without affecting core DNS functionality, but network segmentation limiting inbound DNS traffic could reduce exposure.
| CVE ID | Adjusted Severity | Package | Exploit Probability | Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-33630 | HIGH7.5 | c-ares 1.34.6-r0 fixed in 1.34.8-r0 | — | Directly ExposedContext importance: HIGH |
| CVE-2026-56132 | MEDIUM5.87 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Directly Exposed |
| CVE-2026-56403 | MEDIUM5.87 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Directly Exposed |
| CVE-2026-56404 | MEDIUM5.87 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Directly Exposed |
| CVE-2026-56405 | MEDIUM5.87 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Directly Exposed |
| CVE-2026-56406 | MEDIUM5.87 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Directly Exposed |
| CVE-2026-56410 | MEDIUM5.87 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Directly Exposed |
| CVE-2026-56411 | MEDIUM5.87 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Directly Exposed |
| CVE-2026-50219 | MEDIUM5.02 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.2% Theoretical Threat | Directly Exposed |
| CVE-2026-56412 | MEDIUM5.02 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Directly Exposed |
| CVE-2026-9546 | LOW3.82 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.7% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-9547 | LOW3.77 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.5% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-9080 | LOW3.72 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.5% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-11564 | LOW3.31 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-8924 | LOW3.31 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-8925 | LOW2.92 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 1.1% Low-Moderate Risk | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-11352 | LOW2.7 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 1.0% Low-Moderate Risk | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-9079 | LOW2.7 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 1.1% Low-Moderate Risk | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-8286 | LOW2.48 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.5% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-8926 | LOW2.45 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-10536 | LOW2.4 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.9% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-11856 | LOW2.34 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 1.1% Low-Moderate Risk | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-11586 | LOW2.29 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.9% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-12064 | LOW2.29 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.6% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-8927 | LOW2.29 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.8% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-8932 | LOW2.29 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-9545 | LOW2.29 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.4% Theoretical Threat | Post-Exploit |
| CVE-2026-8458 | NONE0 | libcurl 8.20.0-r1 fixed in 8.21.0-r0 | 0.5% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-56131 | NONE0 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-56407 | NONE0 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-56408 | NONE0 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | 0.1% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
| CVE-2026-56409 | NONE0 | libexpat 2.8.1-r0 fixed in 2.8.2-r0 | <0.1% Theoretical Threat | Not Applicable |
Which CVEs are actually reachable — is the vulnerable code even linked and callable.
Live-container probes: default user, writable paths, capabilities, exposed ports.
Base-image lineage, package provenance and signatures — nothing slipped in unnoticed.
A step-by-step hardened build plan, with parity tests proving nothing breaks.
Want to check another image? Run a full scan with the Docker Security Scanner.